- Series
- Stochastics Seminar
- Time
- Thursday, January 19, 2017 - 3:05pm for 1 hour (actually 50 minutes)
- Location
- Skiles 006
- Speaker
- Dave Goldberg – ISyE, GaTech
- Organizer
- Christian Houdré
Demand forecasting plays an important role in many inventory control
problems. To mitigate the potential harms of model misspecification, various
forms of distributionally robust optimization have been applied. Although
many of these methodologies suffer from the problem of time-inconsistency,
the work of Klabjan et al. established a general time-consistent framework
for such problems by connecting to the literature on robust Markov decision
processes.
Motivated by the fact that many forecasting models exhibit very special
structure, as well as a desire to understand the impact of positing
different dependency structures, in this talk we formulate and solve a
time-consistent distributionally robust multi-stage newsvendor model which
naturally unifies and robustifies several inventory models with demand
forecasting. In particular, many simple models of demand forecasting have
the feature that demand evolves as a martingale (i.e. expected demand
tomorrow equals realized demand today). We consider a robust variant of such
models, in which the sequence of future demands may be any martingale with
given mean and support. Under such a model, past realizations of demand are
naturally incorporated into the structure of the uncertainty set going
forwards.
We explicitly compute the minimax optimal policy (and worst-case
distribution) in closed form, by combining ideas from convex analysis,
probability, and dynamic programming. We prove that at optimality the
worst-case demand distribution corresponds to the setting in which inventory
may become obsolete at a random time, a scenario of practical interest. To
gain further insight, we prove weak convergence (as the time horizon grows
large) to a simple and intuitive process. We also compare to the analogous
setting in which demand is independent across periods (analyzed previously
by Shapiro), and identify interesting differences between these models, in
the spirit of the price of correlations studied by Agrawal et al.
This is joint work with Linwei Xin, and the paper is available on arxiv at
https://arxiv.org/abs/1511.09437v1