Seminars and Colloquia Schedule

The minimum k-way cut problem

Series
Graph Theory Seminar
Time
Friday, June 11, 2010 - 15:05 for 1 hour (actually 50 minutes)
Location
Skiles 254
Speaker
Ken-ichi KawarabayashiNational Institute of Informatics, Tokyo
We consider a the minimum k-way cut problem for unweighted graphs with a bound $s$ on the number of cut edges allowed. Thus we seek to remove as few edges as possible so as to split a graph into k components, or report that this requires cutting more than s edges. We show that this problem is fixed-parameter tractable (FPT) in s. More precisely, for s=O(1), our algorithm runs in quadratic time while we have a different linear time algorithm for planar graphs and bounded genus graphs. Our result solves some open problems and contrasts W[1] hardness (no FPT unless P=NP) of related formulations of the k-way cut problem. Without the size bound, Downey et al.~[2003] proved that the minimum k-way cut problem is W[1] hard in k even for simple unweighted graphs. A simple reduction shows that vertex cuts are at least as hard as edge cuts, so the minimum k-way vertex cut is also W[1] hard in terms of k. Marx [2004] proved that finding a minimum k-way vertex cut of size s is also W[1] hard in s. Marx asked about FPT status with edge cuts, which is what we resolve here. We also survey approximation results for the minimum k-way cut problem, and conclude some open problems. Joint work with Mikkel Thorup (AT&T Research).

A shorter proof for the disjoint paths algorithm

Series
Graph Theory Seminar
Time
Friday, June 11, 2010 - 16:20 for 1 hour (actually 50 minutes)
Location
Skiles 254
Speaker
Paul WollanThe Sapienza University of Rome
The theory of graph minors developed by Robertson and Seymour is perhaps one of the deepest developments in graph theory. The theory is developed in a sequence of 23 papers, appearing from the 80's through today. The major algorithmic application of the work is a polynomial time algorithm for the k disjoint paths problem when k is fixed. The algorithm is relatively simple to state - however the proof uses the full power of the Robertson Seymour theory, and consequently runs approximately 400-500 pages. We will discuss a new proof of correctness that dramatically simplifies this result, eliminating many of the technicalities of the original proof. This is joint work with Ken-ichi Kawarabayashi.