Georgia Institute of Technology College of Sciences

For q a power of a prime, consider the ring \mathbb{F}_q[T]. Due to the many similarities between \mathbb{F}_q[T] and the ring of integers \mathbb{Z}, we can define for \mathbb{F}_q[T] objects that are analogous to elliptic curves, modular forms, and modular curves. In particular, for \mathfrak{p} a prime ideal in \mathbb{F}_q[T], we can define the Drinfeld modular curve X_0(\mathfrak{p}), and study the reduction modulo \mathfrak{p} of its Weierstrass points, as is done in the classical case by Rohrlich, and Ahlgren and Ono. In this talk we will present some partial results in this direction, defining all necessary objects as we go. The first 20 minutes should be accessible to graduate students interested in number theory.

Which commutative groups can occur as the ideal class group (or "Picard group") of some Dedekind domain? A number theorist naturally thinks of the case of integer rings of number fields, in which the class group must be finite and the question of which finite groups occur is one of the deepest in algebraic number theory. An algebraic geometer naturally thinks of affine algebraic curves, and in particular, that the Picard group of the standard affine ring of an elliptic curve E over C is isomorphic to the group of rational points E(C), an uncountably infinite (Lie) group. An arithmetic geometer will be more interested in Mordell-Weil groups, i.e., E(k) when k is a number field -- again, this is one of the most notorious problems in the field. But she will at least be open to the consideration of E(k) as k varies over all fields. In 1966, L.E. Claborn (a commutative algebraist) solved the "Inverse Picard Problem": up to isomorphism, every commutative group is the Picard group of some Dedekind domain. In the 1970's, Michael Rosen (an arithmetic geometer) used elliptic curves to show that any countable commutative group can serve as the class group of a Dedekind domain. In 2008 I learned about Rosen's work and showed the following theorem: for every commutative group G there is a field k, an elliptic curve E/k and a Dedekind domain R which is an overring of the standard affine ring k[E] of E -- i.e., a domain in between k[E] and its fraction field k(E) -- with ideal class group isomorphic to G. But being an arithmetic geometer, I cannot help but ask about what happens if one is not allowed to pass to an overring: which commutative groups are of the form E(k) for some field k and some elliptic curve E/k? ("Inverse Mordell-Weil Problem") In this talk I will give my solution to the "Inverse Picard Problem" using elliptic curves and give a conjectural answer to the "Inverse Mordell-Weil Problem". Even more than that, I can (and will, time permitting) sketch a proof of my conjecture, but the proof will necessarily gloss over a plausible technicality about Mordell-Weil groups of "arithmetically generic" elliptic curves -- i.e., I do not in fact know how to do it. But the technicality will, I think, be of interest to some of the audience members, and of course I am (not so) secretly hoping that someone there will be able to help me overcome it.

An elliptic curve over the integer ring of a p-adic field whose special fiber is ordinary has a canonical line contained in its p-torsion. This fact has many arithmetic applications: for instance, it shows that there is a canonical partially-defined section of the natural map of modular curves X_0(Np) -> X_0(N). Lubin was the first to notice that elliptic curves with "not too supersingular" reduction also contain a canonical order-p subgroup. I'll begin the talk by giving an overview of Lubin and Katz's theory of the canonical subgroup of an elliptic curve. I'll then explain one approach to defining the canonical subgroup of any abelian variety (even any p-divisible group), and state a very general existence result. If there is time I'll indicate the role tropical geometry plays in its proof.

In classical holomorphic dynamics, rational self-maps of the Riemann sphere whose critical points all have finite forward orbit under iteration are known as post-critically finite (PCF) maps. A deep result of Thurston shows that if one excludes examples arising from endomorphisms of elliptic curves, then PCF maps are in some sense sparse, living in a countable union of zero-dimensional subvarieties of the appropriate moduli space (a result offering dubious comfort to number theorists, who tend to work over countable fields). We show that if one restricts attention to polynomials, then the set of PCF points in moduli space is actually a set of algebraic points of bounded height. This allows us to give an elementary proof of the appropriate part of Thurston's result, but it also provides an effective means of listing all PCF polynomials of a given degree, with coefficients of bounded algebraic degree (up to the appropriate sense of equivalence).