TBD by Andrew Stuart
- Series
- School of Mathematics Colloquium
- Time
- Friday, April 23, 2027 - 11:00 for 1 hour (actually 50 minutes)
- Location
- TBD
- Speaker
- Andrew Stuart
Arithmetic Statistics is the study of arithmetic objects as they vary in a family. This is the framework used to analyze distributional properties of discriminants and class groups of number fields, ranks and Selmer groups of elliptic and hyperelliptic curves, low-lying zeroes and central values of L-functions, and many other key objects and invariants. An interrelated web of conjectures (Malle, Cohen--Lenstra, Poonen--Rains, Goldfeld, Katz--Sarnak, Loughran--Santens, and their many refinements) give quite precise conjectural descriptions (based on heuristical models) of the leading terms and asymptotic constants of the counts arising in these distributional questions. However, the secondary terms of the counts are much more mysterious, and very little is known (or even conjectured) about them.
In this talk, I will discuss some of the main distributional questions in arithmetic statistics, give some theoretical and practical explanations of why these secondary terms are so important, and end with explaining a series of results, joint with Manjul Bhargava, Takashi Taniguchi, and Jacob Tsimerman, in which some of these secondary terms are proved to exist, and computed.
Wave turbulence theory provides a unifying framework for analyzing the nonlinear interactions of dispersive waves across diverse physical regimes. These interactions manifest over an extensive range of scales and media, encompassing phenomena such as gravitational waves in astrophysical contexts, surface waves in fluid dynamics, coherent structures in quantum systems, and even pattern formation in everyday fluid flows.
Despite their widespread occurrence, the mathematical analysis of such systems remains exceptionally challenging due to the interplay between nonlinearity, dispersion, and randomness. These difficulties have catalyzed the development of sophisticated analytical and probabilistic tools, drawing from partial differential equations, statistical mechanics, and dynamical systems theory.
In this lecture, I will present a short survey of recent advances in the rigorous treatment of wave turbulence, emphasizing key techniques, foundational results, and persistent open problems. Some attention will be given to the derivation and analysis of kinetic equations and the role of resonant interactions in the long-time dynamics of weakly nonlinear wave systems.
Fractal sets arise naturally when classical notions of length, area, and smoothness are no longer adequate. A central theme in geometric measure theory is to understand how the dimension and geometry of a fractal set are reflected in its projections. Even some of the simplest questions of this type lead to surprisingly difficult problems connecting geometric measure theory with harmonic analysis, combinatorics, and number theory.
One classical example is the Favard length problem, also known as Buffon's needle problem. Given a planar set, its Favard length is the average length of its orthogonal projections. A theorem of Besicovitch implies that a purely unrectifiable set of finite length has Favard length zero. For self-similar sets obtained as limits of finite Cantor constructions, however, a much more quantitative question remains: how quickly does the Favard length of the finite approximations tend to zero? Despite the simple formulation, determining the correct decay rate remains a major open problem.
I will describe the geometry behind the classical problem, some of the main ideas that have led to progress, and what happens when linear projections are replaced by nonlinear families. This leads naturally to a nonlinear analogue of Buffon's needle problem—a Buffon circle problem—and to new questions about unions of circles, nonlinear projections, and the geometry of fractal sets. I will discuss recent results in this direction and the new phenomena that appear when lines are replaced by curves.
We discuss a novel class of swarm-based gradient descent (SBGD) methods for nonconvex optimization. Each agent in the swarm is characterized by its position and mass. The dynamics combines two mechanisms: persistent transfer of mass from agents positioned on “higher ground” to those with lower objective values, and a mass-dependent time-stepping protocol. This coupling creates a dynamic distinction between “leaders” and “explorers.” Heavier agents act as leaders, use small time steps to refine promising regions near local minima, while light agents take larger steps, exploring the landscape for lower objective values. The swarm dynamics adaptively balances exploitation of local refinement with global exploration. We present convergence results and numerical experiments illustrating the effectiveness of SBGD for global optimization.
Working productively with modern AI tools requires looking beyond the products as they are currently packaged, identifying the underlying capabilities that are useful for our own goals, and then building systems to make those capabilities an honest net benefit in practice. The aim is to make the tools suit our interests while preserving what we value in mathematics. I will discuss this perspective through examples centered on research and verification.
Contact geometry has a long history, with connections to many areas of physics and mathematics. I will begin with some history and motivation for contact geometry. I will then discuss the development of contact geometry in dimension three, and the central role knot theory has played in that development. We will end by considering the beautiful structure of special knots in contact manifolds and their use in classifying contact structures on three-manifolds.
Coupled oscillators appear in a large number of applications: e.g. in biological, chemical sciences, neuro science, power grids, and many more fields. They appear in nature: fireflies flashing in sync with each other is one fun situation.
In 1974, Yoshiki Kuramoto proposed a simple, yet surprisingly effective model for oscillators. We consider homogeneous Kuramoto systems (we will define these notions!). They are determined from a finite graph. In this talk, we describe some of what is known about long term behavior of such systems (do the oscillators self-synchronize? or are there other, "exotic" solutions?), and then relate these systems to systems of polynomial equations. We use algebra, computations in algebraic geometry, and algebraic geometry to study equilibrium solutions to these systems. We will see how computations using algebraic geometry and my computer algebra system Macaulay2 finds all graphs with at most 8 vertices (i.e. 8 oscillators) which have exotic solutions.
Note: we assume essentially NO dynamical systems nor algebraic geometry in this talk! This talk should be understandable to a general mathematical audience. The parts of the talk that are new represent joint work with Heather Harrington and Hal Schenck, and also Steve Strogatz and Alex Townsend.
In many applications of mathematical optimization, one may wish to optimize an objective function without access to its derivatives. These situations call for derivative-free optimization (DFO) methods. Among the most successful approaches in practice are model-based trust-region methods, such as those pioneered by M.J.D Powell. These methods rely on function approximations via low degree polynomials and carefully adapt the local geometry of interpolation points to balance exploration and exploitation. While relatively complex to implement, these methods are now available in standard scientific computing platforms, including MATLAB and SciPy. However, theoretical analysis of their computational complexity lags behind practice. In particular, it is important to bound the number of function evaluations required to achieve a desired level of accuracy. Using concepts from Lagrangian interpolation and linear algebra we systematically derive complexity bounds for classical model-based trust-region methods and their modern variations. We establish, for the first time, that these methods can have the same worst case complexity than any other known DFO method.
The spectrum of the discrete Laplacian on a infinite graph, or of its random perturbations such as the Anderson tight-binding model, encodes a rich information about the structure of that space. While natural questions abound (nature of the spectrum, localization of eigenfunctions, behavior of the spectral measure), few admit complete answers outside of very specific cases. In this talk, we will briefly survey some of the main open questions in the area. We will then present an elementary geometric criterion that provides control over the regularity of the spectral measure.