- You are here:
- Home
In this series of talks I will discuss various special plane fields on 3-manifold. Specifically we will consider folaitions and contact structures and the relationship between them. We will begin by sketching a proof of Eliashberg and Thurston's famous theorem from the 1990's that says any sufficiently smooth foliation can be approximated by a contact structure. In the remaining talks I will discuss ongoing research that sharpens our understanding of the relation between foliations and contact structures.
In this series of talks I will discuss various special plane fields on 3-manifold. Specifically we will consider folaitions and contact structures and the relationship between them. We will begin by sketching a proof of Eliashberg and Thurston's famous theorem from the 1990's that says any sufficiently smooth foliation can be approximated by a contact structure. In the remaining talks I will discuss ongoing research that sharpens our understanding of the relation between foliations and contact structures.
In this series of talks I will discuss various special plane fields on 3-manifold. Specifically we will consider folaitions and contact structures and the relationship between them. We will begin by sketching a proof of Eliashberg and Thurston's famous theorem from the 1990's that says any sufficiently smooth foliation can be approximated by a contact structure. In the remaining talks I will discuss ongoing research that sharpens our understanding of the relation between foliations and contact structures.
In the talk, I plan to give a definition of loose Legendrian knots inside contact manifolds of dimension 5 or greater. The definition is significantly different from the 3 dimensional case, in particular loose knots exist in local charts. I'll discuss an h-principle for such knots. This implies their classification, a bijective correspondence with their formal (algebraic topology) invariants. I'll also discuss applications of this result, comparisons with 3D contact toplogy, and some open questions.
In 1997 Hausmann and Knutson discovered a remarkable correspondence between complex Grassmannians and closed polygons which yields a natural symmetric Riemannian metric on the space of polygons. In this talk I will describe how these symmetries can be exploited to make interesting calculations in the probability theory of the space of polygons, including simple and explicit formulae for the expected values of chord lengths.
This is the first in the series of two talks aimed to discuss a recent work of Ontaneda which gives a poweful method of producing negatively curved manifolds. Ontaneda's work adds a lot of weight to the often quoted Gromov's prediction that in a sense most manifolds (of any dimension) are negatively curved.
To every homeomorphism of a surface, we can attach a positive real number, the entropy. We are interested in the question of what these homeomorphisms look like when the entropy is positive, but small. We give several perspectives on this problem, considering it from the complex analytic, surface topological, 3-manifold theoretical, and numerical points of view. This is joint work with Benson Farb and Chris Leininger.
A contact manifold with boundary naturally gives rise to a sutured manifold, as defined by Gabai. Honda, Kazez and Matic have used this relationship to define an invariant of contact manifolds with boundary in sutured Floer homology, a Heegaard-Floer-type invariant of sutured manifolds developed by Juhasz. More recently, Kronheimer and Mrowka have defined an invariant of sutured manifolds in the setting of monopole Floer homology. In this talk, I'll describe work-in-progress to define an invariant of contact manifolds with boundary in their sutured monopole theory.
In this talk I define the braid groups, its Garside structure, and its
application to solve the word and conjugacy problems. I present a braid
group with $n$ strands as the mapping class group of the disk with $n$
punctures, $\mathbb{D}^2-\{p_1\ldots p_n\}$, and a classification of
surface homeomorphisms by the Nielsen Thurston theorem. I will also
discuss results that require algebraic and geometric tools.